By continuing your visit to this site, you accept the use of cookies. They ensure the proper functioning of our services, analytics tools and display of relevant ads. Learn more about cookies and control them

Not yet registered? Create a OverBlog!

Create my blog

Why psychics can never be for real

A psychic is an individual who can supposedly sense things that are not accessible through ordinary sensory perceptions. There are many people who claim to be psychics, but is psychic ability supported by science? Read this article to find out why psychics can never be for real.

Why do we believe in psychics?

With all the challenges and the problems that people face in their everyday lives, it’s very easy to fall victims to a psychic. The so-called psychics claim that they are able to see or predict future events and it’s tempting to try and get future readings or love readings to find out what the future holds for you. Unfortunately, getting a physic reading won’t solve any of your problems. It will simply empty your pocket. The reason why psychics even exist is that people want to believe that such powers are real and that a tarot reading or other types of online readings will magically change their lives.

How psychics deceive people

Cold reading There are two kinds of psychics: the ones who deceive others on purpose and the ones who are self-deceived into thinking that they have special powers. Those in the first category are very good at picking up clues about you. They usually lure you in by offering a free reading to “prove” their abilities and turn you into a client. They may start the conversation with general statements to see your reaction to these statements and judge your character. They also know how to read your body language. This method is called cold reading. Cold reading allows a person to use perception and observation to find out information about another person. The information seems to come out of thin air, and leads others to believe that the “psychic” has special abilities. During cold reading, the psychic asks some vague questions, analyses the answers and makes educated guesses that turn out to be very close to the truth. The psychic appears to know everything about your life, but in reality, most of the information comes from you.

Scientific proof against psychic abilities

A study conducted in 2008 by Kosslyn and Multon, tested several psychic abilities like remote viewing, clairvoyance and precognition. According to the study, there were no distinguishable neural responses between looking at an image psychically sent by a sender to a receiver and looking at a random image. The scientists called this study the strongest evidence against the existence of special mental powers.

Same category articles Psychology

All about psychologists

All about psychologists

Psychologists can help you to deal with a range of issues that affect your mind and have an impact on your life. Knowing what they actually do can help you to gain an insight into this interesting profession.
What is behind self-mutilation?

What is behind self-mutilation?

Self-mutilation is a mental disorder that involves causing intentional self-harm. It can be expressed through cutting, burning, breaking the bones, or any other form of self-injury. Read on to learn more about the causes of self-mutilation.
What are the symptoms of clinical depression?

What are the symptoms of clinical depression?

It is very common for people to go through ups and downs as far as their moods are concerned. This is a natural reaction to the outcome of everyday activities and may last for a short while. But when the negative moods or lows continue for a prolonged period of time, it can be termed as clinical depression. There are many signs that indicate that a person might be suffering from depression.
An explanation of the Abilene Paradox

An explanation of the Abilene Paradox

The theory known as the Abilene Paradox: The Management of Agreement was created by Jerry B Harvey, a professor of management science at the George Washington University in Washington DC. After a personal experience, he realised that organisations often take actions, contrary to what they really want to do, and thereby, defeat the very purpose of the action.